CipherStash Protect vs Formal Protocol Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CipherStash Protect: TypeScript SDK for field-level searchable encryption on PostgreSQL databases. built by CipherStash. Core capabilities include Field-level encryption for individual PostgreSQL columns, Searchable encryption (equality and free-text search on encrypted data), Encrypt strings, numbers, and JSON objects..

Formal Protocol Security: Protocol-aware reverse proxy for datastores & APIs enforcing access policies. built by Formal. Core capabilities include Protocol-aware reverse proxy for datastores and APIs, Real-time data access logging and session management, Automated PII and PHI data classification..

Both serve the Database Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

CipherStash Protect differentiates with Field-level encryption for individual PostgreSQL columns, Searchable encryption (equality and free-text search on encrypted data), Encrypt strings, numbers, and JSON objects. Formal Protocol Security differentiates with Protocol-aware reverse proxy for datastores and APIs, Real-time data access logging and session management, Automated PII and PHI data classification.

CipherStash Protect is developed by CipherStash. Formal Protocol Security is developed by Formal. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

CipherStash Protect integrates with Drizzle, Prisma, Supabase SDK. Formal Protocol Security integrates with Slack, Jira, Linear, Terraform, Pulumi. Check integration compatibility with your existing security stack before deciding.

CipherStash Protect and Formal Protocol Security serve similar Database Security use cases: both are Database Security tools, both cover Database Security. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.