Cerby Access Management vs Cerby Secure Social Media Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cerby Access Management

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in shadow SaaS applications and legacy systems without SSO will find real value in Cerby Access Management because it handles automated provisioning and deprovisioning where your identity provider stops working. The platform covers both NIST Identity Management and Asset Management functions through individualized access tracking and robotic process automation, meaning you're actually reducing manual account sprawl instead of just managing it. Skip this if you need a PAM solution for Unix/mainframe environments or if your entire application stack already supports SCIM; Cerby's strength is fixing the gaps in nonstandard apps, not replacing traditional privileged access management.

Cerby Secure Social Media Access

Security teams managing distributed workforces with shared social media accounts will get the most from Cerby Secure Social Media Access because it actually solves the credential sprawl problem instead of just documenting it; role-based access controls paired with time-bound provisioning and automated revocation mean you're not cleaning up orphaned logins months after someone leaves. The platform maps directly to NIST CSF 2.0's Identity Management function with MFA-enforced access and centralized audit trails that satisfy most compliance audits without theater. Skip this if your organization has fewer than 50 employees or doesn't use social media as a material business function; the overhead of managed email and phone numbers for MFA doesn't pay for itself at small scale.