Byos Secure Embedded Edge vs ThreatLocker Network Control: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Secure Embedded Edge: Hardware SOM providing OS-independent microsegmentation for edge devices. built by Byos. Core capabilities include Retransmission Device (RTD): Decouples network connection from the host OS, preventing network-based attacks from reaching the system or applications, Asset Cloaking: Makes the connected device invisible to other devices on the local network, preventing unwanted discovery or probing, Captive Portal Protection: Enhanced security for devices connecting to public captive portal networks (e.g., airport or hotel Wi-Fi)..

ThreatLocker Network Control: Centrally managed endpoint/server firewall with dynamic ACLs for network control. built by threatlocker. Core capabilities include Centralized firewall management for endpoints and servers, Dynamic ACL-based access control, Policy-based network access using IP address, keywords, or agent authentication..

Both serve the Network Access Control market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge differentiates with Retransmission Device (RTD): Decouples network connection from the host OS, preventing network-based attacks from reaching the system or applications, Asset Cloaking: Makes the connected device invisible to other devices on the local network, preventing unwanted discovery or probing, Captive Portal Protection: Enhanced security for devices connecting to public captive portal networks (e.g., airport or hotel Wi-Fi). ThreatLocker Network Control differentiates with Centralized firewall management for endpoints and servers, Dynamic ACL-based access control, Policy-based network access using IP address, keywords, or agent authentication.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge is developed by Byos. ThreatLocker Network Control is developed by threatlocker. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge and ThreatLocker Network Control serve similar Network Access Control use cases: both are Network Access Control tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.