Byos Secure Embedded Edge vs Soliton NetAttest EPS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Secure Embedded Edge: Hardware SOM providing OS-independent microsegmentation for edge devices. built by Byos. Core capabilities include Retransmission Device (RTD): Decouples network connection from the host OS, preventing network-based attacks from reaching the system or applications, Asset Cloaking: Makes the connected device invisible to other devices on the local network, preventing unwanted discovery or probing, Captive Portal Protection: Enhanced security for devices connecting to public captive portal networks (e.g., airport or hotel Wi-Fi)..

Soliton NetAttest EPS: IEEE 802.1X-based NAC using digital certs for wired, Wi-Fi & VPN access. built by Soliton Systems. Core capabilities include IEEE 802.1X port-based network access control, Digital certificate-based authentication for users and devices, Self-service certificate enrolment via user application..

Both serve the Network Access Control market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge differentiates with Retransmission Device (RTD): Decouples network connection from the host OS, preventing network-based attacks from reaching the system or applications, Asset Cloaking: Makes the connected device invisible to other devices on the local network, preventing unwanted discovery or probing, Captive Portal Protection: Enhanced security for devices connecting to public captive portal networks (e.g., airport or hotel Wi-Fi). Soliton NetAttest EPS differentiates with IEEE 802.1X port-based network access control, Digital certificate-based authentication for users and devices, Self-service certificate enrolment via user application.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge is developed by Byos. Soliton NetAttest EPS is developed by Soliton Systems. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Byos Secure Embedded Edge and Soliton NetAttest EPS serve similar Network Access Control use cases: both are Network Access Control tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.