Binary Defense IP Banlist vs Lunar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Binary Defense IP Banlist is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Binary Defense. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams with limited threat intelligence budgets or those standing up detection baselines will find Binary Defense IP Banlist useful as a free, immediately deployable feed of known-malicious IPs for firewall and SIEM ingestion. The feed is maintained by a 199-person vendor with active threat research operations, so updates reflect real-world reconnaissance and attack infrastructure rather than stale academic data. This is not a substitute for commercial threat feeds if you need attribution context, geolocation scoring, or confidence ratings on IP reputation; it's a straightforward blocklist for teams that need speed and zero acquisition cost.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
