Axon Technologies Train vs LFI-Labs: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Axon Technologies Train is a commercial cyber range training tool by Axon Technologies. LFI-Labs is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building incident response muscle memory and executives who need to understand cyber risk without jargon will find Axon Technologies Train's scenario-based wargames more effective than slide decks. The platform covers SOC defensive work, IR forensics, and offensive techniques across a virtualized environment, hitting NIST CSF 2.0's PR.AT awareness and training function directly. Skip this if your primary need is compliance checkbox training or you're a single-person security shop looking for self-paced modules; Axon's strength is in group workshops that demand organizational bandwidth and commitment.
Developers and junior penetration testers who need cheap, hands-on practice with file inclusion and command injection vulnerabilities should use LFI-Labs; it's free PHP code you deploy locally and actually exploit, not a sanitized sandbox. The 338 GitHub stars and active use in informal security training programs indicate real adoption among people building fundamentals. Skip this if your team needs guided scenarios with scoring, progress tracking, or compliance reporting; LFI-Labs is raw lab work, not a structured cyber range platform.
