Arc4dia Counter-APT Training vs LFI-Labs: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Arc4dia Counter-APT Training is a commercial cyber range training tool by Arc4dia. LFI-Labs is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams with staff who hunt APT indicators or respond to advanced threats should choose Arc4dia Counter-APT Training for its instructor-led model built around tradecraft from practitioners with operational cyber intelligence experience, not theoretical frameworks. The multi-level curriculum runs from foundational reverse engineering and web security through force-on-force engagement scenarios, addressing the full NIST Awareness and Training function. Skip this if your team needs remote, self-paced training or lacks the operational maturity to absorb scenario-based instruction; the value comes from experienced instructors, not polish.
Developers and junior penetration testers who need cheap, hands-on practice with file inclusion and command injection vulnerabilities should use LFI-Labs; it's free PHP code you deploy locally and actually exploit, not a sanitized sandbox. The 338 GitHub stars and active use in informal security training programs indicate real adoption among people building fundamentals. Skip this if your team needs guided scenarios with scoring, progress tracking, or compliance reporting; LFI-Labs is raw lab work, not a structured cyber range platform.
