AWS pwn vs Pacu: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AWS pwn is a free penetration testing tool. Pacu is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and AWS security auditors running isolated penetration tests will find AWS pwn valuable for its script library that automates common attack paths against IAM, S3, and EC2 without requiring commercial tool licenses. The 1,207 GitHub stars and active community contributions validate its tactics, though this is fundamentally a tactical toolkit rather than a full assessment platform. Skip this if you need compliance reporting, continuous monitoring, or remediation workflows; AWS pwn is a manual engagement tool for practitioners who know what they're looking for.
Red teamers and cloud security engineers who need to validate AWS IAM misconfigurations will find Pacu's modular attack chains faster to customize than commercial frameworks, since you can fork the codebase directly. The 4,883 GitHub stars reflect active community contribution and real-world validation against common cloud privilege escalation paths. Skip this if your team lacks AWS-specific offensive knowledge or needs a guided UI; Pacu rewards practitioners who can read Python and chain attacks manually.
