Avydos DDoS Threat Simulation vs Filigran OpenAEV: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Avydos DDoS Threat Simulation

Mid-market and enterprise security teams responsible for DDoS resilience will benefit most from Avydos DDoS Threat Simulation because it's one of the few platforms that actually measures filter quality and detection speed rather than just simulating attacks. The DRS-Score standardizes your results across vendors and infrastructure, which matters when you're validating multiple third-party protections or justifying DDoS spend to finance; DORA and NIS2 compliance mapping also saves you the documentation work. Skip this if your organization lacks the internal bandwidth to run self-service testing regularly, since Avydos demands active engagement rather than passive monitoring.

Filigran OpenAEV

Mid-market and enterprise teams with mature EDR deployments will get the most from Filigran OpenAEV because it validates whether your existing detection stack actually catches real attacks instead of just assuming coverage. The platform's MITRE ATT&CK-aligned simulation library and AI-assisted scenario creation mean you're testing threats your environment actually faces, not generic templates, and the agentless architecture lets you start validating immediately without EDR replacement costs. Skip this if you need a turnkey solution that works without an EDR already in place; OpenAEV assumes you own the detection layer and want to stress-test it.