AT&T SASE vs Optiv Secure Access Service Edge (SASE): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AT&T SASE

Mid-market and enterprise teams with distributed workforces already embedded in AT&T's network infrastructure will see immediate value from AT&T SASE because it eliminates the friction of bolting security onto existing connectivity; you're getting network and access control from the same vendor your pipes run through. The solution scores notably strong on identity and access control per NIST CSF 2.0, which means authentication decisions happen at wire speed without the latency tax you'd pay with a bolt-on SASE from a pure security vendor. Skip this if your organization runs on competing carrier networks or needs advanced threat detection and response; AT&T SASE prioritizes access enforcement over post-breach hunting.

Optiv Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Mid-market and enterprise teams struggling to stitch together point SASE tools across multiple vendors should use Optiv Secure Access Service Edge for the consulting and co-management layer that actually gets you to Zero Trust instead of just buying more boxes. The Zero Trust Maturity Assessment plus support for Check Point, Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Zscaler, and Palo Alto Networks means you're not forced into a single-vendor rip-and-replace. Skip this if you want a pure technology play with no services; Optiv is fundamentally a managed services wrapper, which adds cost but removes the implementation headache most buyers underestimate.