Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service vs AT&T SASE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed offices or remote workforces should evaluate Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service primarily for its single-pass inspection architecture, which eliminates the performance tax most SASE platforms impose on encrypted traffic. The platform's strength in PR.AA (Identity Management and Access Control) and PR.DS (Data Security) aligns with zero-trust enforcement and DLP simultaneously, reducing the number of tools you need to stitch together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience orchestration; Aryaka is built for prevention and detection, not incident response automation.

AT&T SASE

Mid-market and enterprise teams with distributed workforces already embedded in AT&T's network infrastructure will see immediate value from AT&T SASE because it eliminates the friction of bolting security onto existing connectivity; you're getting network and access control from the same vendor your pipes run through. The solution scores notably strong on identity and access control per NIST CSF 2.0, which means authentication decisions happen at wire speed without the latency tax you'd pay with a bolt-on SASE from a pure security vendor. Skip this if your organization runs on competing carrier networks or needs advanced threat detection and response; AT&T SASE prioritizes access enforcement over post-breach hunting.