Asimily Threat and Response vs Gyala Agger: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Asimily Threat and Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting hospital networks, manufacturing floors, and medical device environments need Asimily Threat and Response because it actually understands OT/IoMT anomalies instead of forcing industrial devices into IT detection rules. The platform's FDA recall detection and 100+ threat intelligence sources built specifically for connected medical and industrial assets separate it from generic IoT tools, and automated quarantine with packet capture gives you forensic teeth when incidents happen. Skip this if your environment is mostly standard IT infrastructure with a handful of IoT endpoints; the OT-specific tuning will feel like overkill.

Gyala Agger

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams defending both IT and OT environments need Gyala Agger because it actually sees legacy and air-gapped networks that mainstream EDR platforms ignore. Its behavioral anomaly detection runs on operational state models rather than signature patterns, which matters when you're protecting systems that can't be patched or rebooted. The caveat: Gyala prioritizes detection and response speed over the forensics and recovery depth that mature SOCs demand; if your incident response workflow depends on weeks of historical correlation and root cause analysis, you'll outgrow this tool quickly.