Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service vs Lumen SASE with Versa: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed offices or remote workforces should evaluate Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service primarily for its single-pass inspection architecture, which eliminates the performance tax most SASE platforms impose on encrypted traffic. The platform's strength in PR.AA (Identity Management and Access Control) and PR.DS (Data Security) aligns with zero-trust enforcement and DLP simultaneously, reducing the number of tools you need to stitch together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience orchestration; Aryaka is built for prevention and detection, not incident response automation.

Lumen SASE with Versa

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing legacy branch firewalls with SD-WAN will benefit most from Lumen SASE with Versa because it bundles WAN optimization and zero-trust access into a single agent without forcing rip-and-replace complexity. The Versa Secure Private Access model enforces per-application authentication across remote and branch users, and the integrated Versa Analytics engine surfaces real-time policy violations instead of waiting on security event backlog. Skip this if your priority is threat detection depth; Lumen emphasizes access control and WAN resilience over behavioral analytics, leaving incident investigation and response largely to your existing SIEM.