Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security vs Byos Secure Lobby: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security

Enterprise and mid-market teams running converged IT/OT environments will get the most from Armis Centrix™ IT/OT Security because it actually maps segmentation policy to device reality instead of just visualizing the network topology. The platform covers all five NERC CIP compliance domains and generates ACLs directly from segmentation rules, which matters when you're auditing brownfield industrial sites where manual segmentation documentation is nonexistent. Skip this if your OT environment is air-gapped or if you need deep forensic visibility into lateral movement after breach; Centrix prioritizes prevention and continuous conformance monitoring over post-incident investigation.

Byos Secure Lobby

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting operational technology networks from lateral movement will find Byos Secure Lobby's microsegmented SDN overlay harder to bypass than perimeter-only approaches. The combination of Layer 2 encryption, RSA-secured outbound connections with zero pre-tunnel internet exposure, and direct inter-microsegment routing means attackers cannot pivot between OT devices without explicit policy allowance. Skip this if your priority is threat detection and response rather than access prevention; Byos is deliberately positioned on the containment side of the NIST framework, with minimal visibility into what's happening inside the microsegments once policies are enforced.