Armis Centrix™ for Medical Device Security vs CyberOwl Medulla: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ for Medical Device Security

Mid-market and enterprise healthcare security teams drowning in unmanaged medical device sprawl need Armis Centrix because it actually finds what you don't know is there, then tells you which devices actually matter for patient safety. Passive discovery across unagented devices combined with patient-centric risk prioritization covers NIST ID.AM and DE.CM without requiring network cooperation or device access, which is critical when you're managing legacy ventilators and infusion pumps alongside IT assets. Skip this if your organization wants one platform handling both OT and IT vulnerabilities end-to-end; Centrix prioritizes visibility and continuous monitoring over remediation workflow integration, so you'll still need separate patch management for the devices it surfaces.

CyberOwl Medulla

Maritime operators managing mixed legacy and modern vessel fleets will find CyberOwl Medulla essential for IMO 2021 compliance without ripping out existing systems; the platform monitors operational technology assets across distributed vessels while surfacing cyber risk in terms board members actually care about. Deployment is cloud-based with no requirement to replace onboard systems, and the vendor's continuous monitoring focus (NIST DE.CM) means anomalies get flagged before they become incidents. This tool assumes you're already managing cybersecurity as a fleet-wide problem rather than ship-by-ship; buyers expecting traditional IT network visibility or integration with enterprise SOCs will find Medulla too specialized.