AMT Honeypot vs TANNER: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AMT Honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. TANNER is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams defending legacy Intel systems or managing air-gapped environments with minimal patching velocity will find AMT Honeypot valuable for its surgical focus on CVE-2017-5689 exploitation attempts, the vulnerability that remains actively scanned across enterprise networks six years after disclosure. The tool's Go-based simplicity means it deploys in minutes without the dependency bloat that kills honeypot adoption in resource-constrained labs. Skip this if you need breadth across multiple firmware families or alerting integration; AMT Honeypot logs locally and detects one vulnerability class, period.
Security teams deploying SNARE honeypots will find TANNER's value in its ability to automate realistic HTTP response generation and vulnerability emulation without maintaining separate backend infrastructure. The free pricing model and active GitHub presence (231 stars) make it practical for resource-constrained security operations looking to increase honeypot fidelity without headcount. TANNER is built for detection and intelligence gathering; it won't help teams that need honeypots integrated into a broader incident response or threat hunting platform.
