Akeyless Secure Remote Access vs One Identity Safeguard: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Akeyless Secure Remote Access

Teams managing infrastructure across multiple cloud providers or hybrid environments should choose Akeyless Secure Remote Access to eliminate standing credentials entirely, replacing them with identity-driven just-in-time access tied directly to your SSO. The secretless architecture maps cleanly to NIST PR.AA controls by design, removing the attack surface that traditional PAM tools still carry. Skip this if your infrastructure is entirely on-premises and air-gapped; the cloud-native architecture assumes identity provider integration as your primary authentication mechanism.

One Identity Safeguard

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid infrastructure with Unix, Linux, and Windows endpoints will find One Identity Safeguard's strength in enforcing least-privileged access across operating systems where competitors force separate tooling. The platform's device-level authentication enforcement and policy-based governance directly address NIST PR.AA without requiring forklift replacements of existing Active Directory or Entra ID investments. Skip this if your environment is cloud-native only or you need deep DevOps automation as a primary feature; Safeguard excels at traditional hybrid estates, not greenfield Kubernetes shops.