Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK vs Teller: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK is a commercial key management tool by Akeyless Security. Teller is a free key management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best key management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Enterprise and mid-market security teams managing encryption keys across AWS, Azure, and GCP will find Akeyless Multi-Cloud KMS BYOK valuable for eliminating key sprawl without surrendering control to hyperscaler KMS services. The platform's automated rotation, centralized audit trails, and NIST PR.AA and PR.DS alignment mean you're not just centralizing key management; you're building a control plane that actually shows you who accessed what and when. Skip this if your organization runs primarily on a single cloud and lacks the compliance pressure that makes BYOK economics work, or if you need the KMS to also handle application secrets and database credentials in one system.
Developers managing secrets across multiple cloud providers during local development should use Teller for its provider-agnostic approach; it pulls from AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, 1Password, and others without forcing a single vault standard. The 3,181 GitHub stars and free pricing mean adoption friction is genuinely low for teams testing secret rotation workflows before committing to a paid platform. Skip this if you need runtime secret injection in production containers or centralized audit logging; Teller is built for the laptop-to-staging workflow, not the control plane.
