Akamai Hunt vs PlumHound: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Akamai Hunt is a commercial threat hunting tool by Akamai. PlumHound is a free threat hunting tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat hunting fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams buried in false positives from their existing detection stack should evaluate Akamai Hunt for its managed threat hunting model; you're outsourcing investigation work to Akamai's analysts rather than building internal hunt capability, which trades flexibility for speed on evasive threats. The zero false positive guarantee backed by expert validation directly addresses the alert fatigue problem most teams cite when justifying new tooling. Skip this if your organization needs hunt automation you control internally or lacks the network telemetry depth to feed the service; Hunt works best when you've already instrumented flow data and segmentation policies across your environment.
Red teamers and penetration testers evaluating Active Directory attack paths will find PlumHound essential because it translates BloodHoundAD's graph queries into written reports that actually get board attention, not just JSON exports. The tool is free and maintained across 1,281 GitHub stars, removing cost as a barrier to adoption in lean security teams. Skip this if your org needs continuous monitoring of live AD changes rather than point-in-time assessment; PlumHound excels at one-off engagements and remediation tracking, not real-time threat hunting.
