AISI DFIR vs Cyber Triage Cyber Triage Collector: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AISI DFIR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to move fast on active incidents will find AISI DFIR's managed service model cuts through the hiring shortage for in-house forensics expertise. The Scout and Hunter tools automate evidence collection and persistence removal directly on affected systems, compressing response timelines that would otherwise stretch weeks. The caveat: this is a managed service first, so your team trades hands-on control for speed and specialist depth, making it less suitable for organizations that need full visibility and control over every forensic decision.

Cyber Triage Cyber Triage Collector

Incident responders and forensic analysts who need fast Windows triage without waiting for full disk imaging will find Cyber Triage Collector's adaptive collection model cuts investigation time significantly; it pulls over 1,000 artifact types intelligently rather than blindly copying everything. The tool deploys through your existing EDR stack, CrowdStrike or Defender, so there's no new agent infrastructure to maintain, and output goes directly to S3 or Azure for immediate analysis. Skip this if you're managing mixed-OS environments at scale or need post-incident recovery capabilities; Cyber Triage Collector is Windows-focused triage and doesn't handle the full DFIR workflow.