Aikido Virtual Machine Scanning vs ITrust IKare: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aikido Virtual Machine Scanning

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing mixed VM estates in production will find real value in Aikido Virtual Machine Scanning's agentless approach, which eliminates the operational friction of deploying agents across unstable or legacy infrastructure. The differential scanning feature meaningfully reduces bandwidth overhead in large environments, and severity recalculation based on VM purpose prevents alert fatigue from false positives tied to workload context. Skip this if you need deep OS hardening assessment or compliance-specific checks; Aikido prioritizes vulnerability detection over the broader configuration and policy evaluation you'd get from platforms like Qualys or Rapid7.

ITrust IKare

Mid-market and SMB security teams with distributed networks will get immediate value from ITrust IKare because its geographically distributed scanning actually works at scale without the complexity of managing separate console instances. The hybrid deployment model and multi-level dashboards mean you can scan branch offices and remote sites without centralizing everything back to headquarters, which matters when your infrastructure is physically scattered. Skip this if you need vulnerability management tightly integrated with patch orchestration or SOAR workflows; IKare excels at finding what's exposed and what's misconfigured, not at automating the remediation chain that follows detection.