Aikido EOL Scanner vs CyCognito Active Security Testing: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aikido EOL Scanner

Security teams managing polyglot codebases across GitHub, GitLab, and container registries should pick Aikido EOL Scanner because it detects unsupported dependencies before they become compliance violations or attack surface. The tool maps EOL components to internet-exposed runtime instances, which forces prioritization conversations your team actually needs to have instead of drowning in dependency reports. Skip this if your organization runs a single language stack or hasn't integrated version control and container scanning into your asset inventory yet; Aikido's value compounds with deployment complexity.

CyCognito Active Security Testing

Security teams responsible for external attack surface management should pick CyCognito Active Security Testing because its multi-pass testing architecture actually finds vulnerabilities that single-pass scanners skip, then surfaces them with discoverability and attractiveness scoring so you stop triaging noise. The platform covers ID.AM and ID.RA functions across cloud and on-premises infrastructure simultaneously, which matters when your external footprint spans multiple hosting providers. Skip this if you need integrated remediation workflows or threat intel feeds; CyCognito is strictly the testing layer, not the ticketing system.