Agent Permissions vs Primary Zero Trust Architecture: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Agent Permissions: Enforces per-user permission boundaries for AI agents at the tool-call level. built by Agentic Fabriq. Core capabilities include Intersection-based permission resolution: agent grants intersected with acting user's own access, Per-user permission overrides on shared agent deployments, Default-deny posture with additive grants at org, team, and member levels..

Primary Zero Trust Architecture: Zero Trust control plane for human and agentic AI identity enforcement. built by Primary. Core capabilities include Continuous identity verification for human and agentic actors, Least-privilege access control scoped by actor, data classification, workflow stage, and context, Real-time policy enforcement at the moment of each interaction..

Both serve the Agentic AI Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Agent Permissions differentiates with Intersection-based permission resolution: agent grants intersected with acting user's own access, Per-user permission overrides on shared agent deployments, Default-deny posture with additive grants at org, team, and member levels. Primary Zero Trust Architecture differentiates with Continuous identity verification for human and agentic actors, Least-privilege access control scoped by actor, data classification, workflow stage, and context, Real-time policy enforcement at the moment of each interaction.

Agent Permissions is developed by Agentic Fabriq. Primary Zero Trust Architecture is developed by Primary. The vendor behind a product decides its roadmap, support, and longevity, so check each company's profile before you commit.

Agent Permissions and Primary Zero Trust Architecture serve similar Agentic AI Security use cases: both are Agentic AI Security tools, both cover Zero Trust Architecture, Agentic AI Security, Least Privilege. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.