Acapulco (Attack Community grAPh COnstruction) vs Tango: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Acapulco (Attack Community grAPh COnstruction) is a free honeypots & deception tool. Tango is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Acapulco (Attack Community grAPh COnstruction)
Security teams running Splunk who want to operationalize honeypot data without building custom parsers should evaluate Acapulco. It transforms raw hpfeeds into clustered attack patterns and visualizations in minutes, cutting the overhead of manual correlation work that most teams skip entirely. The free price point and GitHub availability mean zero procurement friction. Skip this if your honeypots aren't already feeding hpfeeds channels or if you lack Splunk; the tool's value lives entirely within that ecosystem.
Security teams with limited budgets who want to deploy honeypots without custom engineering will find Tango's Splunk integration valuable; the free pricing and pre-built scripts eliminate the usual barrier to deception tactics. At 255 GitHub stars and backed by functional Splunk apps, Tango makes detection-focused honeypot deployments genuinely accessible to teams of 20-100. Skip this if your organization needs response automation or threat intelligence feeds tied to honeypot activity; Tango is detection infrastructure, not a complete deception platform.
