689Cloud SecureDrive vs Forcepoint Data Detection Response: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

689Cloud SecureDrive

Mid-market and enterprise teams shipping sensitive documents outside the firewall need 689Cloud SecureDrive for post-download revocation; it kills access to files already on someone's laptop, which standard cloud sharing cannot do. The platform maps cleanly to NIST PR.DS and PR.AA, with document-level tracking and role-based permissions that satisfy audit trails without requiring IT to babysit every share. Skip this if your primary concern is detecting exfiltration rather than preventing it; 689Cloud assumes the adversary already has the file and focuses on neutralizing its value instead.

Forcepoint Data Detection Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams with sprawling cloud and endpoint data need Forcepoint Data Detection Response because it actually sees unstructured data that most DLP tools ignore, then stops exfiltration before it happens. The AI classification handles both structured and unstructured content across clouds and endpoints simultaneously, and automated response cuts the window between detection and containment from hours to minutes. Skip this if your priority is compliance reporting over active threat hunting; Forcepoint prioritizes DE.CM and DE.AE (continuous monitoring and incident analysis) at the expense of heavyweight audit trail features that tick boxes for auditors.