360 Privacy 360 Defend vs Flare Identity Exposure Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

360 Privacy 360 Defend

Enterprise security teams protecting executive-level personal data will find 360 Privacy 360 Defend's strength in its managed removal and dark web surveillance; the vendor's human-led verification model catches data broker deletions that automated-only services miss. Coverage spans ID.AM asset identification and DE.CM continuous monitoring across hundreds of sources with real-time doxxing alerts, backed by audit-ready reporting. Skip this if your priority is rapid incident response or if you need coverage for employee-wide data exposure rather than targeted executive protection.

Flare Identity Exposure Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing credential sprawl across development and cloud infrastructure need Flare Identity Exposure Management because it actually remediates exposed credentials instead of just alerting on them; the Entra ID integration means stolen passwords get rotated automatically, not left in the dark web indefinitely. Dark web monitoring alone is table stakes, but its stealer log analysis and API key detection on GitHub repositories catches the exposures that matter before attackers weaponize them. Skip this if your organization has minimal cloud adoption or doesn't run Microsoft identity infrastructure; the strongest ROI sits with teams already managing Entra ID at scale.