SecuPi Proactive Data Security Platform vs Zama Protocol: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

SecuPi Proactive Data Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting regulated data across hybrid cloud environments will see immediate value in SecuPi's agentless real-time monitoring combined with row-and-column-level access controls; this combination stops insider threats at the database layer without the visibility gaps that traditional SIEM approaches leave. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions across detection, prevention, and asset management, with particular strength in Continuous Monitoring and Data Security where it enforces controls that most competitors push to the application layer. Skip this if your priority is detection-heavy threat hunting; SecuPi weights prevention and compliance automation over the behavioral analytics granularity that SOCs hunting advanced threats demand.

Zama Protocol

Enterprise blockchain teams handling sensitive financial data or regulatory-constrained DeFi operations should adopt Zama Protocol specifically for encrypted smart contracts that settle on public chains without exposing transaction details to validators or competing protocols. The Fully Homomorphic Encryption layer lets you compute directly on encrypted balances and token transfers,something no standard L1 or L2 provides natively,and the Solidity compatibility with euint data types cuts implementation time versus building custom cryptographic layers. Skip this if you're running private blockchains or permissioned consortiums; the FHE overhead and 20 tps throughput per chain make it a poor fit for organizations that can simply restrict network access instead.