Yar vs SprayingToolkit: 2026 Comparison

Yar

Pentesters and red teamers doing reconnaissance on a tight budget should start with Yar; it automates user enumeration, repository scanning, and vulnerability surface mapping across targets without licensing friction. The free pricing model and 238 GitHub stars indicate active maintenance and community validation for offensive workflows. Skip this if you need post-exploitation persistence tooling or OSINT integration beyond what GitHub and public APIs expose; Yar is reconnaissance-first and stops short of lateral movement automation.

SprayingToolkit

Penetration testers and red teamers targeting Microsoft environments need SprayingToolkit for its purpose-built attack chains against Lync, Skype for Business, and OWA; the modular design of Atomizer, Vaporizer, Aerosol, and Spindrift lets you chain attacks without rebuilding payloads between targets. The 1,557 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption in assessments where off-the-shelf commercial tools either overkill the scope or lack the flexibility to handle hybrid authentication stacks. Skip this if you're looking for a polished UI or post-exploitation frameworks; SprayingToolkit is Python scripts, nothing more, and demands you understand what each tool does before running it.