Android port of Radamsa vs Yar: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. Yar is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Pentesters and red teamers doing reconnaissance on a tight budget should start with Yar; it automates user enumeration, repository scanning, and vulnerability surface mapping across targets without licensing friction. The free pricing model and 238 GitHub stars indicate active maintenance and community validation for offensive workflows. Skip this if you need post-exploitation persistence tooling or OSINT integration beyond what GitHub and public APIs expose; Yar is reconnaissance-first and stops short of lateral movement automation.
