ocaml-yara by Elastic vs Xplot: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ocaml-yara by Elastic is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Xplot is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
OCaml developers embedding malware detection into custom security tools should use ocaml-yara for direct access to YARA's pattern-matching engine without language boundary overhead. The bindings are maintained by Elastic and free, which matters for teams building detection pipelines that need to call YARA thousands of times per second without spawning subprocess overhead. This is a poor fit for teams expecting a polished UI or integration with third-party threat feeds; ocaml-yara is a low-level library, not a scanning platform.
Incident response teams with large packet capture backlogs will find Xplot's speed advantage worth the free price; color-coded TCP analysis cuts analysis time on network forensics work that would otherwise require manual trace parsing or expensive commercial alternatives. The tool handles gigabyte-scale pcap files without the overhead of full-stack DFIR platforms, making it particularly useful for lean teams doing ad-hoc packet investigation rather than automated response. Skip Xplot if you need threat hunting across multiple data sources or NIST Respond capabilities like automated remediation; this is a single-function parsing tool, not a platform.
