Matos Automated Attack Surface Management vs Wappalyzer: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Matos Automated Attack Surface Management

Startups and SMBs with sprawling multi-cloud footprints should pick Matos Automated Attack Surface Management because it finds shadow assets and orphaned infrastructure that your teams don't know exist, without requiring agents or manual tuning. The continuous discovery engine covers ID.AM (asset inventory) and DE.CM (anomaly detection) simultaneously, meaning you get both visibility and active monitoring from one deployment. Skip this if you need deep vulnerability correlation across on-premises datacenters; Matos is cloud-native by design and will feel limited in hybrid environments with heavy legacy infrastructure.

Wappalyzer

Security teams mapping external attack surface for web applications should start with Wappalyzer because it identifies technology stacks faster and cheaper than manual reconnaissance, and the free tier actually works without constant upsells. You get API access to scan hundreds of sites monthly, which beats the pay-per-lookup model competitors use. Skip this if you need continuous passive monitoring of your own infrastructure or vulnerability correlation baked in; Wappalyzer is a lookup tool, not a persistent scanner, so you're running point-in-time checks rather than feeding live asset data into your SIEM.