OneSpan Identity Verification vs Verificient Proctortrack: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

OneSpan Identity Verification

SMB and mid-market compliance teams need OneSpan Identity Verification to stop fraud during customer onboarding without building KYC workflows from scratch. The platform covers real-time identity document verification, facial biometric matching, and machine learning-based fraud detection across 195+ countries, meaning you're not rebuilding compliance infrastructure for every new market. Skip this if your organization needs post-authentication access controls or continuous identity monitoring after onboarding; OneSpan is front-door verification, not ongoing session risk assessment.

Verificient Proctortrack

Academic institutions and online credentialing platforms need Verificient Proctortrack because its biometric identity verification, continuous facial recognition, and browser lockdown actually stop impersonation and test fraud at scale. The platform supports deployment across startup through enterprise, processes exams 24/7/365 with both automated AI detection and live human proctors, and directly addresses NIST PR.AA identity management requirements. Skip this if your primary concern is preventing cheating through content security or question banks; Proctortrack assumes your exam integrity strategy already handles those layers and focuses entirely on proving the test taker is who they claim to be.