Adaptive Identity Proofing vs OneSpan Identity Verification: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Adaptive Identity Proofing

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing high-friction signup flows will get the most from Adaptive Identity Proofing, since its risk-based workflows let you demand proof only when signals warrant it rather than gate every user. The SignalPrint tracking system and government document verification cover PR.AA identity management rigorously, reducing both fraud and abandonment. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication or session management bundled in; Verosint is focused narrowly on the proofing moment itself.

OneSpan Identity Verification

SMB and mid-market compliance teams need OneSpan Identity Verification to stop fraud during customer onboarding without building KYC workflows from scratch. The platform covers real-time identity document verification, facial biometric matching, and machine learning-based fraud detection across 195+ countries, meaning you're not rebuilding compliance infrastructure for every new market. Skip this if your organization needs post-authentication access controls or continuous identity monitoring after onboarding; OneSpan is front-door verification, not ongoing session risk assessment.