EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs Veridify Security DOME: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams struggling with lateral movement inside industrial networks will find real value in ThinGUARD 2.0's device-level access control, which actually stops unauthorized movement between functional units rather than just logging it. The plug-and-play deployment means you're not rewriting control system logic or waiting months for integration, and the NIST PR.AA and DE.CM alignment proves it delivers on identity lockdown and continuous visibility simultaneously. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience over access prevention; ThinGUARD is built for containment, not post-breach orchestration.

Veridify Security DOME

Building automation and IoT teams without dedicated OT security staff should pick Veridify Security DOME because it enforces Zero Trust at the device level without requiring you to replace existing control systems or hire specialists to deploy it. The platform covers PR.AA authentication and PR.IR infrastructure resilience across BACnet, Modbus, DNP3, and other standard OT protocols, with blockchain-backed device identity that persists even if firmware gets compromised. Skip this if you need mature SOAR workflows or deep forensic replay; DOME is built for prevention and continuous monitoring, not post-breach investigation.