ANGOKA Zero Trust Management (ZTM) vs Valarian ACRA: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ANGOKA Zero Trust Management (ZTM)

Enterprise security teams managing distributed cyber-physical infrastructure will get the most from ANGOKA Zero Trust Management because it treats machine identity as the enforcement point rather than bolting zero trust onto existing network architecture. The platform covers all four NIST CSF 2.0 pillars,identity management, infrastructure resilience, continuous monitoring, and asset management,which is rare for tools in this space. Skip this if your environment is primarily cloud-native SaaS; ANGOKA's strength in OT/ICS and hybrid physical systems means it's overbuilt for pure IT shops running standard IAM.

Valarian ACRA

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need hard isolation between sensitive workloads will get the most from Valarian ACRA; its compartmentalized architecture actually enforces data and compute boundaries rather than just controlling access to them. The platform covers PR.AA, PR.DS, and PR.IR across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning identity, data protection, and infrastructure resilience are built into the enclave model from the start. Skip this if your priority is detection and response speed; ACRA prioritizes containment and audit over continuous monitoring, making it a better fit for compliance-heavy environments than incident response teams.