ThreatLocker Storage Control vs USB Firewall: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

ThreatLocker Storage Control

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in USB and removable media incidents will find real value in ThreatLocker Storage Control because it locks down device access at the policy level without requiring constant manual intervention. The granular controls,blocking by serial number, vendor, and file type while tracking every copied file,deliver the PR.AA and PR.DS coverage most endpoint platforms leave as an afterthought. Skip this if your organization treats storage device control as a checkbox; the tool demands thoughtful policy design upfront and won't work as a fire-and-forget appliance.

USB Firewall

Mid-market and enterprise security teams that need to block data exfiltration via USB without reimaging endpoints should evaluate USB Firewall; its department-level control granularity and air-gapped system support handle the specific use cases where USB remains your actual attack surface. The tool maps directly to PR.AA and PR.DS in NIST CSF 2.0, with centralized logging that satisfies audit requirements most endpoint platforms ignore. Skip this if your threat model prioritizes detection and response over prevention, or if you need USB controls as a secondary feature bolted onto a broader EDR suite.