HarfangLab Vulnerability Assessment vs ThreatMapper: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
HarfangLab Vulnerability Assessment is a commercial vulnerability assessment tool by HarfangLab. ThreatMapper is a free vulnerability assessment tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best vulnerability assessment fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
HarfangLab Vulnerability Assessment
Mid-market and enterprise teams that can't afford the overhead of continuous manual scanning will see immediate payoff from HarfangLab Vulnerability Assessment; the lightweight agent model delivers daily CVE correlations across your entire endpoint inventory without requiring a separate EDR or EPP layer. The vendor's ability to support air-gapped environments with manual NIST updates and hybrid deployment across cloud and on-premises infrastructure means you're not locked into a single architecture. Skip this if you need vulnerability management tied to threat intelligence or remediation workflow automation; HarfangLab prioritizes detection and prioritization over the downstream response side.
DevSecOps teams in container-native organizations should use ThreatMapper for runtime attack path enumeration; it maps exploitable chains from vulnerable components to actual lateral movement and exfiltration routes, which agentless scanners simply cannot do. The free pricing and 5,236 GitHub stars indicate real adoption among engineering teams who need to validate whether a CVE actually matters in their runtime context. Skip this if your org needs vulnerability remediation workflows tied to ticketing systems or if you lack container orchestration expertise to interpret the attack paths it surfaces.
