TENEX Incident Response vs TENEX Threat Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

TENEX Incident Response

Mid-market and enterprise teams already committed to Google Cloud will find TENEX Incident Response worth evaluating for its AI-driven triage and automated containment across 300+ security tools, eliminating the manual sorting that burns through SOC capacity. The platform's strength in detection and response (NIST DE.CM and RS.MA) is genuine, but it prioritizes the fast containment half of incident management over post-breach investigation and forensics; if your team spends more time on deep-dive analysis than on stopping active threats, this is optimized for the wrong workflows. Skip this if you need vendor-agnostic MDR without Google ecosystem lock-in.

TENEX Threat Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with Google Cloud infrastructure will get the most from TENEX Threat Management because its native integration with Google Security Operations eliminates the friction of bolting MDR onto existing SecOps platforms. The service covers the full NIST incident lifecycle from continuous monitoring through post-incident analysis, with human-led threat hunting paired to AI detection so you're not relying on automation alone. Skip this if your stack is AWS or Azure-native; forcing Google Cloud as your MDR backbone creates more problems than it solves.