KonaSense vs Teleskope AI Security & Governance: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

KonaSense

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in shadow AI sprawl need KonaSense to actually see what's happening before enforcing policy, not after. It maps every GenAI tool employees are using, then blocks sensitive data exfiltration and prompt injection at the moment of interaction; the investigation-grade audit trail means you can replay exactly what got sent to ChatGPT and why it was allowed or blocked. Skip this if your organization hasn't yet quantified which departments are using which AI tools, because KonaSense assumes you want control, not visibility theater.

Teleskope AI Security & Governance

Mid-market and enterprise security teams building ML pipelines need Teleskope AI Security & Governance to map what training data actually flows into models before those models hit production. The platform discovers and classifies 150+ data types including PII and secrets at 40,000 bytes per second, then enforces access controls and redaction with referential integrity intact, covering both ID.AM asset inventory and PR.DS data protection rigorously. Skip this if your org treats AI governance as a compliance checkbox rather than a data risk problem; Teleskope assumes you're serious about continuous monitoring across the full ML lifecycle.