Pomerium Pomerium Zero vs Teleport Zero Trust Access: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Pomerium Pomerium Zero

Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing VPN with Zero Trust network access will value Pomerium Pomerium Zero's clientless architecture, which eliminates the endpoint agent burden that slows adoption in distributed workforces. The platform scores strongly on NIST PR.AA (Identity Management) and supports just-in-time access provisioning with time-bound controls, meaning you're not managing standing privileges at scale. Skip this if your primary concern is detection and response; Pomerium prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over threat hunting, and you'll need a separate EDR layer for that story.

Teleport Zero Trust Access

Infrastructure teams tired of managing VPNs and SSH keys should pick Teleport Zero Trust Access for its cryptographic identity model that eliminates static credentials entirely; the platform assigns ephemeral, device-bound access tokens that expire automatically, cutting the attack surface VPN-dependent shops inherit. It covers the full stack,servers, databases, Kubernetes, cloud consoles, and CI/CD systems,with session recording baked in, meeting NIST PR.AA and DE.CM requirements without bolting on separate audit tools. Skip this if your environment is mostly SaaS applications and you need conditional access rules at scale; Teleport is built for infrastructure-first organizations willing to swap perimeter thinking for identity-driven controls.