CrowdStrike Endpoint Security vs TEHTRIS EDR OPTIMUS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CrowdStrike Endpoint Security

Enterprise and mid-market security teams should pick CrowdStrike Endpoint Security if you need detection and response speed that actually reduces dwell time; Charlotte AI automates triage and investigation at scale, which is where most teams hemorrhage hours. The platform achieved 100% protection scores in MITRE ATT&CK 2025 evaluations and handles cross-domain visibility through Falcon integration, meaning you're not stitching together point products. The single lightweight sensor across Windows, Mac, and Linux does matter for deployment friction. Skip this if you're primarily hunting for gaps in platform security hardening or need deep incident recovery workflows; CrowdStrike prioritizes DE.CM and DE.AE over RS.MI, which means it excels at finding and analyzing threats but offers less automation once containment decisions are made.

TEHTRIS EDR OPTIMUS

Mid-market and enterprise teams overwhelmed by alert noise will appreciate EDR OPTIMUS for its automated threat remediation and integrated NGAV with neural networks, which actually closes the gap between detection and response instead of just flagging more incidents. The platform covers all five NIST CSF 2.0 categories from prevention through incident mitigation, with particular strength in continuous monitoring and automated response via no-code SOAR playbooks. Skip this if you're a small team needing lightweight agent footprint or an organization already deep in a Crowdstrike or Microsoft Defender ecosystem, since switching costs outweigh the gains.