Syrup vs Kippo Detect: 2026 Comparison
Syrup is a free honeypots & deception tool. Kippo Detect is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running exposed SSH infrastructure who want to see what attackers actually do once they breach credentials will find Syrup's session recording and fake shell interactions invaluable for threat intelligence; the Go implementation keeps deployment lightweight on commodity hardware. Its 99 GitHub stars and free pricing make it a low-friction addition to existing detection workflows, though it prioritizes observation over blocking, so pair it with network controls if you're treating SSH as a critical perimeter. Skip Syrup if you need production-grade SSH access management or NIST Respond capabilities; it's purely about understanding attacker behavior after the fact.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need to validate whether their own SSH honeypots are externally detectable will find Kippo Detect useful for that specific audit. The tool directly fingerprints Kippo instances over the network, catching a common misconfiguration that leaves honeypots exposed. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose honeypot detection framework or broader deception monitoring; Kippo Detect does one thing and won't tell you about Cowrie, Dionaea, or other SSH trap variants.
