Sweet Security Runtime CNAPP vs Upwind Security Posture: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Mid-market and enterprise teams running AI workloads need Sweet Security Runtime CNAPP because its purpose-built LLM actually deprioritizes noise instead of just generating more alerts. The vendor covers four of six NIST CSF 2.0 core functions, with particular strength in DE.CM and DE.AE; the AI stack security monitoring for models, agents, and architecture fills a gap most runtime platforms ignore entirely. Skip this if you need broad CSPM or vulnerability scanning in the same tool; Sweet Security is deliberately focused on runtime detection and AI-specific threats, not asset inventory or compliance reporting. Teams managing multi-cloud sprawl across SMB to enterprise scale will benefit most from Upwind Cloud Runtime Visibility because it surfaces exposure paths and blast radius before incidents cascade across your asset graph. The platform covers all four NIST CSF 2.0 functions,asset discovery, risk assessment, continuous monitoring, and resilience,which means you're not bolting together separate tools for inventory and context. Skip this if your priority is vulnerability scanning alone; Upwind prioritizes runtime relationships and risk ranking over raw CVE volume, so traditional vuln-first buyers will feel the tradeoff.