Habu Hacking Toolkit vs Sudomy: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Habu Hacking Toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. Sudomy is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal red team capacity on a budget should reach for Habu Hacking Toolkit; it gives you Python-native attack primitives that integrate cleanly into custom exploitation workflows without licensing friction. The 973 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool mature enough for repeatable penetration testing scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven platform or commercial support; Habu demands Python fluency and rewards operators who read code, not buttons.
Bug bounty hunters and solo pentesters who need fast subdomain discovery without vendor lock-in should reach for Sudomy; it combines multiple enumeration sources into a single CLI tool that costs nothing and runs offline. The 2,241 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real adoption in the bounty community, where speed and portability matter more than UI polish. Skip this if your team needs a web dashboard, API integrations with your ticketing system, or support for complex enterprise environments; Sudomy is built for individual researchers who prefer command-line tools and self-contained workflows.
