StrongDM Access Control vs XYPRO XYGATE Access Control (XAC): Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

StrongDM Access Control

Teams managing access across databases, servers, and Kubernetes clusters who want to kill standing privileges entirely will find StrongDM Access Control built exactly for that job; the just-in-time provisioning model with credential-less access means your engineers get what they need without permanent keys sitting in memory or config files. The platform enforces policies in real time based on user context and logs everything for audit, which covers the identity management and continuous monitoring functions that actually matter when an engineer's credentials leak. Skip this if you need a unified access platform that also handles entitlements across SaaS applications; StrongDM focuses on infrastructure access and doesn't try to stretch into identity governance.

XYPRO XYGATE Access Control (XAC)

Enterprise and mid-market security teams running HPE NonStop systems should pick XYPRO XYGATE Access Control because it's the only PAM built for NonStop's unique architecture, delivering keystroke and sub-command auditing that general-purpose PAM platforms simply cannot enforce on that infrastructure. The tool's NIST PR.AA coverage is solid,granular RBAC and ABAC controls with Zero Trust enforcement address the access control side,but NIST DE.CM coverage is lighter, meaning you're getting strong preventive controls without sophisticated behavioral analytics built in. Skip this if your NonStop footprint is minimal or if you need a vendor-agnostic PAM that covers Windows, Unix, and cloud infrastructure equally; XYPRO is purpose-built for one platform.