What features do Common Fate vs StrongDM Access Control offer?

**Common Fate** differentiates with Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level. **StrongDM Access Control** differentiates with Just-in-Time (JIT) access provisioning, Zero standing privileges enforcement, Role-based access control (RBAC).

Who makes Common Fate vs StrongDM Access Control?

**Common Fate** is developed by Common Fate. **StrongDM Access Control** is developed by strongdm. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Common Fate a good alternative to StrongDM Access Control?

Common Fate and StrongDM Access Control serve similar Privileged Access Management use cases: both are Privileged Access Management tools, both cover SSO. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Common Fate vs StrongDM Access Control: 2026 Comparison Guide

Q: What is the difference between Common Fate vs StrongDM Access Control?

**Common Fate**: JIT privileged access mgmt platform for cloud-native teams on AWS & GCP. built by Common Fate. Core capabilities include Just-in-time (JIT) privileged access to AWS and GCP accounts, Time-bound and fine-grained access provisioning, Secure database access control and auditing down to row-level.. **StrongDM Access Control**: PAM platform with JIT access, zero standing privileges, and policy-driven control. built by strongdm. Core capabilities include Just-in-Time (JIT) access provisioning, Zero standing privileges enforcement, Role-based access control (RBAC).. Both serve the Privileged Access Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.