Mobile Verification Toolkit (MVT) vs stoQ: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Mobile Verification Toolkit (MVT) is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. stoQ is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile Verification Toolkit (MVT)
Incident responders and forensic analysts investigating suspected mobile compromise should reach for Mobile Verification Toolkit first; it extracts and cross-references artifacts from Android and iOS devices against known spyware indicators in ways commercial tools charge thousands for. With 12,223 GitHub stars and active use in real investigations, MVT has proven detection rates against NSO, Predator, and other surveillance-grade malware. Skip this if your threat model is consumer phishing or you need post-breach recovery guidance; MVT is a surgical detection instrument, not a remediation platform.
Incident response teams at mid-market organizations will get the most from stoQ because its automation framework cuts investigation time by letting you chain together existing tools instead of replacing your stack. The open-source foundation means zero licensing friction and a growing library of pre-built connectors for common forensics workflows. Skip stoQ if your team needs a commercial support SLA or a polished UI; this is purpose-built for analysts comfortable with API-first tooling and will feel rough around the edges to buyers coming from enterprise SOAR platforms.
