SprayingToolkit vs LinkedInt: 2026 Comparison
SprayingToolkit is a free offensive security tool. LinkedInt is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers targeting Microsoft environments need SprayingToolkit for its purpose-built attack chains against Lync, Skype for Business, and OWA; the modular design of Atomizer, Vaporizer, Aerosol, and Spindrift lets you chain attacks without rebuilding payloads between targets. The 1,557 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect real adoption in assessments where off-the-shelf commercial tools either overkill the scope or lack the flexibility to handle hybrid authentication stacks. Skip this if you're looking for a polished UI or post-exploitation frameworks; SprayingToolkit is Python scripts, nothing more, and demands you understand what each tool does before running it.
Penetration testers and security researchers who need to map organizational structures and identify target personas will find LinkedInt's automation valuable; manual LinkedIn scraping wastes hours that this tool collapses into minutes. The 1,200 GitHub stars signal active community use and maintenance, which matters for a free tool where vendor support is nonexistent. Skip this if your scope requires persistent monitoring of profile changes or integration with broader OSINT platforms; LinkedInt is a one-shot reconnaissance sprint, not continuous intelligence.
