Soliton NetAttest EPS vs TiFRONT Cloud Security Switch: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Soliton NetAttest EPS

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with mature certificate infrastructure will get the most from Soliton NetAttest EPS because it enforces access control at the network edge through IEEE 802.1X without forcing a wholesale identity platform replacement. The tool covers wired, Wi-Fi, and VPN access from a single policy engine and handles certificate lifecycle automation well enough that unmanaged devices and BYOD don't become administrative overhead. Skip this if your organization lacks the PKI maturity to deploy and rotate short-lived certificates at scale, or if you need visibility-first NAC that profiles user behavior before deciding access; NetAttest is fundamentally about certificate validation, not anomaly detection.

TiFRONT Cloud Security Switch

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid infrastructure need TiFRONT Cloud Security Switch primarily for its network-layer threat blocking without requiring agent deployment across every asset. The tool covers critical NIST PR.AA and DE.CM functions through 802.1X authentication and continuous malicious traffic detection, which means fewer gaps between your access control and monitoring layers. Skip this if you're heavily invested in next-gen firewalls or need deep application-layer visibility; TiFRONT operates as a complementary network access control layer, not a replacement for existing perimeter security.