SecuPi Proactive DAM vs Self-Protecting Data Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

SecuPi Proactive DAM

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing hybrid database infrastructure need SecuPi Proactive DAM for its agentless deployment and real-time activity monitoring that doesn't require database agents or performance overhead. The tool maps cleanly to NIST ID.AM and PR.DS controls, giving you asset visibility and fine-grain access enforcement without the operational friction of agent-based competitors. Skip this if your priority is forensic depth over operational speed; SecuPi prioritizes continuous monitoring and prevention over deep historical forensics for incident reconstruction.

Self-Protecting Data Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting SQL and NoSQL databases against insider threats and advanced persistent compromise will get the most from Self-Protecting Data Platform, which embeds fragmentation and dynamic encryption directly within data rather than relying on perimeter controls. The platform's zero-trust execution environment and Flee Mode autonomous relocation directly address NIST PR.IR (infrastructure resilience), and the HoneyBot deployment provides the continuous monitoring and incident analysis coverage that most database security tools skip. Skip this if your priority is compliance-checkbox coverage or if you need real-time query performance at scale; the fragmentation overhead and geo-distributed shard architecture require substantial infrastructure redesign.